There’s been criticism of a study from the US suggesting that the coronavirus could have been present in the Chinese city of Wuhan as early as August last year.
The study by Harvard University, which gained significant publicity when it was released earlier this month, has been dismissed by China and had its methodology challenged by independent scientists.
The research, which hasn’t been peer-reviewed, is based on satellite imagery of traffic movements around hospitals in Wuhan and the tracking of online searches for specific medical symptoms.
It says there was a noticeable rise in vehicles parking outside six hospitals in the city from late August to 1 December 2019.
This coincided, says the Harvard report, with an increase in searches for possible coronavirus symptoms such as “cough” and “diarrhoea.”
This would be an important finding because the earliest reported case in Wuhan wasn’t until the beginning of December.
The academics write: “While we cannot confirm if the increased volume was directly related to the new virus, our evidence supports other recent work showing that emergence happened before identification at the Huanan Seafood market.”
The Harvard study has gained a lot of traction in the media, with President Trump, who has been highly critical of China’s pandemic response, tweeting a Fox News item highlighting the researchers’ findings. The tweet has been viewed more than three million times.
The study claims there was an increase in online queries for coronavirus symptoms, particularly “diarrhoea”, on popular Chinese search engine Baidu.
However, Baidu company officials have disputed their findings, saying there was in fact a decrease in searches for “diarrhoea” over this period.
The term used in the Harvard University paper actually translates from Chinese as “symptom of diarrhoea”.
On Baidu’s tool that allows users to analyse the popularity of search queries, like Google Trends.
The search-term “symptom of diarrhoea” does indeed show an increase in queries from August 2019.
However, the term “diarrhoea”, a more common search-term in Wuhan, and it actually showed a decrease from August 2019 until the outbreak began.
Harvard paper Benjamin Rader said that “the search term we chose for “diarrhoea” was chosen because it was the best match for confirmed cases of Covid-19 and was suggested as a related search term to coronavirus.”
Looking at the popularity of searches for “fever” and “difficulty in breathing”, two other common symptoms of coronavirus.
Searches for “fever” increased a small amount after August at a similar rate to “cough”, and queries for “difficulty in breathing” decreased in the same period.
There have also been questions raised about the study using diarrhoea as an indicator of the disease.
A large-scale UK study of nearly 17,000 coronavirus patients found that diarrhoea was the seventh most common symptom, well below the top three: cough, fever and shortness of breath.
Across the six hospitals, the Harvard study reported a rise in cars in hospital parking lots from August to December 2019.
The report states that images with tree cover and building shadows were excluded to avoid over or under-counting of vehicles.
However, satellite images released to the media show large areas of hospital car parks blocked by tall buildings which means that it’s not possible to accurately assess the number of cars present.
There’s also an underground car park at Tianyou Hospital, which is visible on Baidu’s street view function, but only the entrance is in view on satellite imagery – not the cars underneath the ground.
One of the authors of the study, Benjamin Rader said “we definitely can’t account for underground parking in any time period of the study and this is one of the limitations of this type of research.”
There are also concerns about the choice of hospitals for the study.
Hubei Women and Children’s hospital is one of the sites included, but children rarely require hospital treatment for coronavirus. In response, the authors say their findings would still show increased car park usage overall even if this hospital were to be excluded from the survey.
The researchers could also have compared their data with hospitals in other Chinese cities, to see if the rises in traffic and search queries were specific to Wuhan, being where the outbreak first came to light.
Without that comparison the evidence for Wuhan residents receiving treatment for coronavirus from August last year remains highly contestable.
There is, however, which we don’t know about the early spread of the virus in Wuhan.